View Single Post
  #62   Report Post  
Old April 8th 04, 08:04 AM
Jacob Norlund
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Internet radio generally means being tied to an internet-connected
computer, preferably with broadband. The majority of Americans do not
have broadband as of yet. Even with broadband, "tuning" internet radio is
an annoyance. Many of the stations aren't available, and when they are,
you can expect a nice 10+-second delay between clicking "Listen" and
actually hearing something. With shortwave, one can tune around freely
and comfortably. Plus, how many people do you know that regularly listen
to internet radio? Not saying shortwave has any more, but still...

As for satellite, it might be nice with XM and all, but the range of
international voices are still small on those services (XM and Sirius).
There may be the BBC, and isn't DW on the other sat? But what about VOR,
R Vatican, RVI, R Netherlands, R Japan, R Australia, etc. Do you actually
think smaller broadcasters (at least less-known ones) will be on the birds
any time soon? From impressions, Worldspace hasn't been going over too
well in the third world, either. It would be awesome to have an open
satellite radio system good for exploring and having a technical element
to it, kind of like shortwave or even satellite TV (Telstar 5, etc.), but
XM and Sirius are nothing more than corporate-controlled networks for
normal consumers who want clear audio and familliar sounds. There is no
thrill.

"Satellite and internet" are definitely not the forces driving shortwave
stations off the air in developing nations. It's more likely things like
broader FM radio coverage, satellite/local TV, etc. Shortwave, however,
remains the most effective method in such nations of covering a large
audience with little resources (e.g. 1 250 kW SW transmitter vs. 50 50 kW
FM transmitters).

Even in the first world, portability is an issue. Portable shortwave
receivers are small and convenient. If you're out in the wilderness
camping, you can pull out a shortwave with a few dozen feet of wire
attached and hear the VOA, REE, BBC, or Deutsche Welle, without a
subscription or any serious hassles. Has anybody tried listening to
internet radio in such an environment?

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 01:04:03 -0400, Dan Robinson wrote:

Shortwave is, to our dismay, on the way out. Anyone
who uses as hope the fact that some areas of the world
are still in "need" of shortwave is ignoring the great
potential of internet and satellite for reaching these
same places. Stations are not going to continue to
pay to support shortwave transmission means just
to reach the remotest folks in villages in Africa and
Asia simply because these people are still "thirsting"
for free and objective information. After all, solar
powered internet is already a reality in many places,
as is solar and other alternative powered sat TV.
Hard for many of us (including those of us working in
international broadcasting) to swallow, but it's the
truth...

From: "Mark S. Holden"
Reply-To:
Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 00:19:15 -0400
Subject: Shortwave's decline over past five years

tommyknocker wrote:

I was just thinking about this today. Has anybody noticed that shortwave
radio has really declined over the past five years or so? We've lost BBC
and Deutsche Welle transmissions to North America, we've lost several
smaller European broadcasters entirely, other stations have drastically
cut back. Are transmitting facilities really going on the blink so soon
after the end of the cold war? Or has everybody jumped on the BBC's
bandwagon and concluded that satellite and internet broadcasting has
replaced shortwave? Any thoughts?


I'm not happy when I hear another major broadcaster is going to cut back
or stop broadcasting to the USA, but I think shortwave will be around
for a very long time.

In certain parts of the world, internet connections are scarce. Some
parts of the USA don't have affordable access to high speed connections.

While the internet is competition in some respects, it's also a great
resource for information to help you get more enjoyment out of the SW
hobby.

It may just be positive thinking, but it seems we've had somewhat of an
uptick in the number of pirate stations over the last couple years.

The other thing to consider is back when the hobby started, the number
of signals was probably a small fraction of what we have to choose from
today.

Of course one thing you can do to help promote the hobby is get the
better radios you're not using into the hands of kids.