View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 12:57 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Roy if I have violated Newtons laws please inform me were I did that . I
admit you did not say that I did , but
surely you would not made a comment that was unrelated..............would
you ? I am only presenting a point of view, not to assure to all that I am
correct but to ascertain the error of that logic and certainly not to
advance the theory of perpetual motion even tho you may view me as an idiot
to ask such a silly question on this forum. If one is unsure even on the
most simple of things
then he is doomed to remain simple because he exposed his underbelly for
target practice.by asking for assistance

Art

"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
The law of conservation of energy is a touchstone you should always use
as a reality check for whatever theory you have. If your theory leads to
a conclusion that contradicts that law, then either your theory is wrong
or there was an error in some step along the way from the theory to the
conclusion.

Or you belong to the perpetual motion machine crowd.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

wrote:

Points raised noticed and placed in my thoughts bag to digest.
With respect to radiation I revolve solidly about accedleratio during a
point in time, accelleration required to negotiat a turn which even at
constant speed create acceleration and lastly arangements that create

more
current without the loss of energy of which I see as coupling. Since I

am
pretty much self taught because of a loss of memory onslaught it is easy

to
build on sand without a true geoligists report which is not available

when
one works alone. Thus I am curious as to where exactly I have gone

astray by
not having a thorough education in R.F. workings. So if there is cycliic
increases of radiation per unit length then I see the same unit length

in
spiral form introduces an addition vector of forces that I translate

into
radiation, I have a history of not being able to adequately explaining

my
thought so hopefully the above will assist in explaining my thought
processes even tho they may seem totally rediculus to those edu8cated in

the
field of whom I ask for correction.
From how I see it I have not viotated any laws with this thinking but

now is
the time for me to put things in there proper place.and accepted without
rancour.
Regards
Art