View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 01:12 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 23:40:12 GMT, "
wrote:

Richard I need more explanation than that because power is somewhat
irrelevant.


You then broach the remainder of your post in terms of acceleration -
which requires power, and deceleration which begats power.

There is no room for "extra" in the power budget.

Radiation in my mind (and I must be now worst off than I really thougt) is
accelleration and decelleration of current


I recognize this as a commonplace expression in this group (not unique
to you by any means). It is one of the most ill-conceived statements
ever to come down the pike and your conundrum (as for others) in
trying to retrofit it into a theory is part and parcel to its poor
analogy.

I need it explained
in every day language


Hi Art,

The plain, every day language of budgets is there. If you cannot
balance that simple ledger, then you have scant chance of
understanding the larger enigma.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC