Exactly right, Brenda Ann.

Treason would be something more along the lines of allowing the Communist
Chinese to have advanced missle technology in return for hefty campaign
contributions.

-- Stinger

"Brenda Ann Dyer" wrote in message
...

"Chandler7600" wrote in message
...

RIGHT !
- Anything Less Than Complete Support Of Our Commander In Chief Is
Treason
!!!

Sorry, wrong. Treason is a pretty narrow concept actually. If what you
said were true, then ours would not be a country worth fighting for. Take
a
look at the Constitution.. that very first Amendmant is a real eye-opener.
We not only have a right to disagree or not support our
"Commander-in-Chief", we have the right to rid ourselves of him in the
next
election, if we so desire. You must be thinking of either:

1) Some Communist or Fascist dictatorship or

2) UCMJ regulations which state that no servicemember may speak ill of any
superior officer, which includes the "Commander-in-Chief" Even this is not
treason, however, and generally results in a less-than-honorable
discharge.