Hi Hal
I'LL be happy to explain where I am coming from but this time I will try to
explain my thoughts
in a non technical way which may be seen as folksy which may well bring some
caustic comments
but I do owe it to all since I asked for help.
First
My aiim is to negate the onslaught of inductance and capacitance to ward
off rapid changes in
impedances
Secondly
I want to see what changes occur by using corregated material as radiators
compared to smooth surfaces..
Now I will rerlate how my thought processes work even tho they may be
totally out of whack
but it will help to explain the terms I use.

If one looks at an A.C. generator it can be seen that the shaft rotates at a
constant speed and
it helps to see this by attaching a ball on a string and tieing it to the
shaft. The circular motion when looking at the shaft endwise
makes the circular pattern very obvios. If however, you look at the shaft
side ways on what you will see is a ball going up and down
either siode of the shaft. If one moves the generator a short distance as
the ball takes one revolution
a sinosoidal; trace will be apparent arount the shaft axis which can be
interprete by some as showing acceleration and deceleration of current
even tho that hwich generates this trace or graph is rotating at a constant
spoeed
( This being important because it may be synonamous to some as compared to
the speed of light)
Now let us look at another version of movement in that the generator instead
of moving in a linear motion takes on a circular motion
and where the rotary speed of the shaft still revolves at a constant speed.
From this. we can say that the speed of energy along the radiator is still
the same as in the first example ,but what is different?
If the generator was moved forward in the fiirst instance there was an equal
and opposite reaction force which can be seen
as a cloud of dust as a car accelerates forward. In the second instance the
car traveling around a circular course showers dust in a continual
fashon away from the track even though it is proceding at a constant speed.
If we try to generate a graph of current versus time the dust generated on
a circular track is a constant i.e. then also the current
level on the graph must also be a constant value.
Now let us look at a current flow on a load on a antenna such as a coil
which is hellicaly wound.
We know that the phase will be constant around the first loop but in this
case we have added inductance and capacitance by virtue
of the close proximity of the next coil and the next coil e.t.c which varies
the impedance along the wire and thus rapidly effects
a movement away from a purely resistive impedance. This lead me into
separating the coils from each other by juxtaposition
so that inductances were not additive ( I reversed the coil direction as
well as positioning them apart.)
Since all these coils are connected in series one must hope for a
intercoupling effect will bring the current down on these
vertical portions in the event that radiation from them are of the correct
choice, either additive or detractive.
Thus the project is repeated from what I have done in the past only this
time I am using numourus loops in the event that
resulting antenna height will be eye opening as well as very broad banded.
As a follow up the corregations on the loops will be
removed by laying on the surfaces a flat adhesived back aluminum tape(Ihave
no copper tape) To try and ascertain what changes
occur by having a smooth surface radiator
Well Hal there you have it, possibly to long, possibly everything is wrong
and again possibly hopeless to understand
but it the best I can do
Regards
Art






"Hal Rosser" wrote in message
...
Ok, so the acceleration is in the phase-shifting between the adjacent
coils
?
If I interpret that correctly, then its not a 'real' acceleration, but a
simulated acceleration - much like using pulsating DC to generate
simulated
AC.
If you could describe it in terms a normal dummy like myself could
understand or at least draw a better picture, your theory may be taken
more
seriously.
You say Roy's word is not good enough - But Roy has demonstrated his
expertise in this area time and time again.
I come here to learn from folks like Roy - and to inject some of my own
thoughts from time to time.
You come to the group asking for comments - and you got them.
You did not speak in terms of technical details - so a reply using
technical
details may not be deserved.
There is no disgrace in asking questions (like you said) - but rejecting
expert opinions can be seen as a disgrace in some instances.


" wrote in
message
news:dJeUc.269797$%_6.33856@attbi_s01...
Hi Hal, nice to meet you
What I have is not really a prposition or a legitimate theory, it is
just