View Single Post
  #17   Report Post  
Old May 10th 04, 07:09 PM
m II
 
Posts: n/a
Default

-=jd=- wrote:

What does any of that have to do with your personal choice to refuse to
condemn the muslims as well for their attrocities? Why does which "side"
they were on have any bearing on your *selective* condemnation of
attrocities? Now you have demonstrated you are a hypocrite on a whole new
level! Good-Gravy Man! When you find yourself in a hole, the first thing
to do is to stop digging! You are the only one who can be perceived as
"defending" attrocities by your selective condemnation that refuses to
condemn the Chechen muslims for their barbarous acts.

I'm afraid I won't be able to allow you to spin your way out of this one.

You still remain steadfast in your failure to also condemn the muslims in
Chechnya for their attrocities. You still fail to have a valid point of
reference when you freely choose to *selectively* condemn attrocities.


It's *EASY* to condemn the Islamic types who commit these atrocities. I
have no love for Islam per se. In certain circles, the tenets of Islam
have caused what can best be described as a mental illness, of the same
variety heard on nut case shortwave 'religious' broacdasts.

Lunacy is lunacy and it doesn't respect borders or political camps.

I should have been clearer in my rants, as you seem to have mistaken my
postings as a defense. It's not now or ever has been a defense. What
I've been trying to show, is that there *is* a lead up to what these
people do.

In the vast majority of cases, whether it's a real or perceived wrong,
it appears that REVENGE is a major cause of the action.

Look at the insanity in Palestine or, previously, in the Northern part
of Ireland. It never ends and it's always 'the other side' that's a
criminal.

Look at Custer and the Little Big Horn. Custer may well have been a
mental case who had NO business being in the Military. Seen in the
retrospect of what the westward moving settlers had already done to the
native population, ask yourself this.

Was Custer a hero or *******? Did the 'natives' act in a spontaneous
manner or did something lead them to the events?

The hard core perverts will be by in a minute to tell us that every
'bloody indian' should have been exterminated BEFORE the troubles
started. That opinion is the one I am against, not yours, where all
atrocities are condemned.



mike