If you do have evidence of any of this, you are obligated (in my view) to lay
it out, and put these folks away. If you don't have proof, stop crying the
same
mournful tune and let it go.
Linus

ah, but it is illegal to carry out that obligation, becaues to do so, I have to
FULLY expose everything illegal those particular ham radio operators did, and
to FULLY expose everything they did, I also have to expose innocent people who
don't want their names on the internet and who don't want their adresses
revealed on the internet, which is illegal to do without their permission since
they are innocent people.
And no, I'm not able to get their permission to do so.

Just me mentioning the city where it happened, a requirement for proof, and
then later just mentioning the innocent peoples' names in the same proofs
reveals their location and adress by anyone who decides to look it up.

It was already on the news here that judges have ruled it illegal to do such.

Therefore, the closest I can come in a legal way is only partially exposing
them, otherwise innocent people could get hurt.

Changing the innocent peoples' names is considered "fraud" by the judges.