T. Early wrote:

Now, if it's a FAMILY operation, don't you think the arch villain
pro war types would tend to lump ALL it's members with the same brush?


Actually, no. Thre bottom line is this, despite yet another tortuous
attempt to disguise and overstatement/incacuracy: 1) you say in basic
black and white that Berg was on "enemies list" (forgetting for the
moment how obscure that "list" is); 2) in actuality, Berg himself is
not on any "list," as the article clearly illustrates; 3) you
backtrack, conceding that....well it's really the "family firm". In
the future, please at least try to design your headers for truth as
opposed to maximim shock value. The latter is too easy to debunk.


Maximum shock value is the only reason I got into this racket. I'm still
trying to recover my sense of self esteem for having been fired from the
'National Enquirer' due to 'exagerated' articles. "No one will believe
this crap" said the Editor as I handed over my 'The President is a HUMAN
BEING' article to him.


Where did the 'Enemies List' say "This company is against us, but
the kid is OK" ??

Doesn't this idea of lunatic fringe 'lists' of people expressing an
opinion remind you of the 'fellow travellers' smears of the McCarthy
era witch hunts? Even bloody CHURCH groups are enemies of the State on
this list! Very totalitarian...


No it doesn't remind me of that because nobody--except apparently some
bizarre website--gives a **** about what they say. And if they are in
fact lunatic fringe, they are certainly no more so than numerous
places I've been directed to by following links posted by you.


No more so? That's a good start. Thank you.



missed my mixed metaphor, eh Tad?



mike