Michael 'I use Crisco like peanut Butter' Bryant wrote:

From: "-=jd=-"

He has his point of view and he articulates it well. I'm not required to
agree with him. He's not required to agree with anything I write either.
However, no-one gains anything by degrading the validity of their
opinions by resorting to vitriol and personal insult. I just think that
when someone posts with a level of common courtesy, you *should* feel
compelled to reciprocate, whether you agree with them or not. There's
certainly a glaring lack of common courtesy in society today and there's
absolutely nothing wrong with demonstrating some when you get a chance.
That's all I'm saying.

This from someone that has never rebuked Steve Lare for his daily common
courtesies. In fact, JD has gone out of his way to tell me that it was
my respomsibility, since I asked for it. All you're doing JD is showing
how inconsistent and hypocritical you really are.


And I have never rebuked *YOU* for doing the _exact_ _same_ _thing_. It
has been my observation that you have started most every flame-fest you've
been involved in within RRS. So not "no" , but "HELL NO!", I'm not going
to defend someone who apparently does not have the slightest comprehension
of the word hypocrite when they try to apply it incorrectly to others. In
any event, anyone with a penchant for initiating flame-fests by being the
first to sling arrows is not worthy of defending. Yeah - I'm the hypocrite
because I won't stick up for *you* when you set your own butt on fire.

I didn't ask you to stick up for me, JD. That's an example of how you "bend
words." I simply asked why you don't throw the same taunts at my discourse that
you seem to hold back from others. I've yet to see you hold ANYONE on your
"political side" to the same standards that you demand from me. Not one. Ever.


Perhaps you can enlighten me as to why a "College-Level Debate Coach"
should require a third-party to defend him in *any* debate? Exactly why is
it *my* responsibility to defend you? Please explain. I'll try not to soil
myself from suppressing the uncontrollable laughter.


As Stinger suggested, I have pointed out many of the same arguments. I
don't usually engage in insults until the other party initiates them.


It has been my observation that you are the first to turn vitriolic and/or
insulting in most every flame-fest involving you. That you even wrote that
line is patently incredulous. It borders on blatant narcissism.

Jesus Christ! I'm insulted and attacked in here by Lare and friends (and I'm
beginning to put you in that group)daily. You've seem to continue now with
insults about my "college level debate coach" past whether I say anything or
not. Not a day goes by that you don't INITIATE more insulting reminders of how
you feel about me. But I always iniate them, right? Do you REALLY believe that
I initiate every conflict? With Steve Lare? Geez, there goes any hope for your
objectivity, whatsoever! Oh yeah, I was the first to turn vitriolic when
dealing with the likes of Tracy Fort, right? Saying things like that greatly
diminishes any credibility you might seek for your well-expressed, but wrong,
perspectives.




I
sure don't see you calling out folks like N8KDV, Teleamon, Tracy Fort or
RHF for their insult-laden posts. I guess that's because they're on your
side, right.

What a putz!



*WHO* have I "called out" for their "insult-laden" posts? What are you
blathering about now? Where have I "called out" anyone for the insult-
content of their posts?

You've called me out daily every day for the last week for making insult-laden
vitriolic posts. Don't you read your own posts? (Read the post I'm responding
to!!) Try to divert all you want, but why don't you apply the same critique to
people on your side of the political divide??

I may be a "putz" in your view, but at least I'm not a "college-level
debate-coach". Now, go insult some more people, ya hypocrite!

See?! There are many people, mostly on your side, that have defended for more
insult-laden forms of discourse. I don't start every dialogue with insults,
though I will utilize them when people can rise to no higher level. Where are
the critiques of discourse applicable to the insults coming from N8KDV, Tracy
Fort, RHF, or Telamon, to just name a few? Some of those people you can't
possibly say I initiate the insults with since I haven't responded to some of
them for months.

Why so one-sided, Mr. Rationality? You call me a drama-queen, but you seem to
be doing a damn fine job of doing that by abandoning any objectivity in your
race to arrive at the more credible insult.

And, yes sir, you are being an INCREDIBLE hypocrite. Your one-sided attempt at
objectivity in discourse standards is a clear window into your own biases.

And you're just WRONG on most things no matter how you dress up your ideas.

And no matter how you tried to dress it up you still lied about that PhD.

You are a liar and a fabricator! You have absolutely no business teaching anywhere.
You are a disgrace to the educational sytem.