View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 4th 04, 06:18 PM
Jack Painter
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ian White, G3SEK" wrote
Jack Painter wrote:
"Single Point ground"...this means *not* daisy-chaining to a bus bar
behind equipment tables if possible, and connecting each piece of
equipment to one (1) point that becomes the station's single point
ground. *Not* several ground rods from "individual" equipment. After
you collect all the station bonding straps at a single point, then you
run to a very close ground rod. After you hit that first single ground
rod with the bus from all station equipment,


OK, I follow all that; but it doesn't fully address the original
poster's question about ground routing inside the operating room.

The question really is: what's the best *practical* way to route the
grounding from that single exit point to all the individual pieces of
equipment on the operating desks?

Even a small amateur station can be spread over several feet of desk;
L-shaped corner layouts are very common; and the OP is talking about an
even larger U-shaped layout. This means the distances from individual
items of equipment to the common the ground exit point can range from a
few feet up to even a few tens of feet (in terms of the minimum
practical distance around the rear of the desks). Also, modern amateur
stations are heavily cross-connected by signal/data/control cables,
which provide additional paths for damaging current surges to get inside
the equipment.

Everyone agrees (I hope) that the objective is to keep all the equipment
at the same potential, even when the local ground potential "bounces"
due to a nearby strike. Above all, the objective is to avoid current
surges going through the insides of individual items - those are what do
the damage.

For all the practical reasons outlined above, I don't believe there is a
completely "right" answer to the grounding problem inside the operating
room. Every practical method seems to have some drawbacks.

Based on your experience, what are your views about that specific
problem, Jack?
--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek


Right Ian, having equipment spread out over a wide area is an undesireable
condition, but a reality for many operators. Running 3" wide or greater
copper strapping in individual paths to one single bus "collector" is a
challenge, but one worth trying. Equipment stacked or racked together could
certainly be "grouped" and a common bonding strap run for each group to the
SPG. But 20 linear feet of bus bar could have huge transient voltages
developed across it from a nearby strike. As in a few hundred thousand volts
between supposedly "grounded' equipment. Hence the importance of all
equipment connecting to the same ground point, not via a long run of common
bus bar to that ground point. Make your compromises according to your
individual requirements and station layout. Just realize that in a nearby-by
strike, lightning will find the weak points in any system and exploit that
weakness to the fullest possibility. I experience numerous nearby strikes
that probably raise the ground potential several hundred thousand volts, and
expose my entire ground system to those voltages. If there were large
potential differences between even bonded equipments in the station, deadly
hazards would exist. It's all about choices, and we all have to make them.

Best regards,

Jack Painter
Virginia Beach VA