"T. Early" wrote in message
...

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: "T. Early"

Now that's a scandalous revelation! Imagine hiring a lawyer! WOW!

Yep, he probably needs one given how deep he's involved in the
leaking of that
CIA agent's name to the press. That is against the law, right?


Yes, it is against the law. And now that you've shown, contrary to
widely held belief, that you're capable of getting something right,
why don't you go for two and provide any support for your statement
that -he's- deeply involved in the leak.

BTW, refusing in the moment to speak with investigators until a lawyer
is present is commonly known as "lawyering up." Consulting with one
in anticipation of questioning isn't. Yet another attempt at an
inflammatory header that just comes off wrong.

Bryant never lets facts get in the way of his rants.