View Single Post
  #99   Report Post  
Old September 6th 04, 12:48 AM
Wes Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 19:24:02 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

|Gentlemen, excuse me butting in.

Not at all, after all, you started this mess.
|
|I suspect all these learned articles to be invalid because the authors
|incorrectly assume the source impedance to be constant and the load
|impedance to be the variable in any analyses or sets of measurements.
|
|Whereas the internal or source impedance is actually a function of the load
|(and many other factors).
|
|I have not read these papers or articles but base my comments on what I have
|gleaned from newsgroup conversations over the years.

What a hoot. You constantly battle old wives and then say that you
base your comments on newsgroup conversation!
|
|In brief, how can you have a conjugate match with the source impedance
|hopping about trying to follow the load? ;o)

Iteration.