In article ,
(RHF) wrote:

= = = (John Byrns) wrote in message
= = = ...
In article
, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

In rec.antiques.radio+phono Telamon
wrote:
I've been reading it from here to and I'm not happy.

Maybe you should not read it instead of trying to speak for people that
don't want you to speak for them.

Oh come on now and be a good net citizen and not cross post.

If cross posting is bad net citizenship why is it a feature of usenet in
the first place?


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/

JB,

Cross-Posting is like the Coloring Book and Crayons "Test"
for 5 Year Old 'little' Boys.

The ones that can Color-within-the-Lines are consider "AT" Grade.
[ Normal Development. ]

The ones that 'scribble everywhere' are identified for special
attention and/or medication.

The "Test" is given again in various forms at 8, 11 and 14 Years
of Age to little Boys.

Many of the ones who still refuse to Color-within-the Lines by
Age 14 can be found in a Juvenile Custody Facility.
{Lack of Self-Control and/or Acting Out Anti-Social Behavior}

~ RHF


So what you are saying is that Usenet is some kind of giant testing
facility for boys past the age of 14, else why have the cross posting
facility in the first place? What about little girls, do they get a free
pass?


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/