Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote:
Telamon wrote:
Snip
The discussion has everything to do with listening to the BCB,
and radio theory.
If you would spend time reading the group you would see the several
cross posted threads don't mesh well with rec.radio.shortwave. The group
is generally about listening to SW, BCB and sometimes long wave. There
is discussions about radios specifications, antennas and receiving
challenges. Other topics revolve around the programming or hearing
pirates and the like. Yes the group goes off topic a lot on what people
listen to on short wave.
There is no good reason to cross post these threads to three groups.
I think you are outnumbered.
Talks on BCB receiver designs cannot be bad for all three groups IMHO.
I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.
I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.
I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?
Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.
This is it guys I'm not asking again.
I hear your request but you are the only one to complain about what
many including myself is a trivial issue.
I for one don't think it is impolite to talk about radio construction
on a radio listeners disscussion group.
There are plenty of opinions I don't ask for, but which get hurled in my
direction
and as long as they are not downright insulting, obscene,
verbally violent, I tolerate them every day without complaint.
There are episodes of grossly OT threads, and the occasional spot of humour,
and that adds colour, even real weather to dull days of serious chit chat.
You are invited to consider a more tolerant position, and rather than complain
about the noisy party,
come over and join in!
Patrick Turner.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
|