-=jd=- wrote:
On Thu 17 Jun 2004 11:53:20a, m II wrote in
message news:Q7jAc.48510$Ds.9055@clgrps12:


-=jd=- wrote:


I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it
serves as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both
ways -AND- that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last
to realize that fact!

Cry me a river...

The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request
NOT to bother his employers.


And what was N8KDV's repeated (ad-nauseum) public demands in here that the
spammer *cease* emailing him? You *honestly* do not have the capacity to
see the entire view - only the limited range of a single thread, and then
pass judgement based solely on that limited view? Come now!



A public disclosure of it is about the same as a wire tap on an
unknowing person. It stinks.


After the volume of public demands to stop emailing N8KDV, how in the
world do you rationalize that MWB had even the *slightest* reasonable and
prudent expectation of privacy in further spamming N8KDV? It doesn't stink
at all - It smells wonderful! You appear to have a rather limited and
skewed sense of what an unauthorized wire-tap is. There is simply *zero*
comparison...


How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of
some unimportant newsgroup BS?



I would feel sincerely embarrassed for you that you actually fell for that
line of BS!

You bought into that hook-line-sinker, didn't you? Forgive me for
chuckling at your expense. What kind of job exposes you to termination
because of a silly flame-war on usenet?

One that objects to the use of company resources and time.....
.....well you fill in the rest.