RadioBanter - View Single Post

July 1st 04, 03:40 AM

In article ,
(RHF) wrote:

= = = Telamon wrote in message
= = = ...
In article ,
(RHF) wrote:

RC (KB7QHC),

Spoken (written) like a True Amateur, and precicly why most SWLs
ignore what is written in reply to SWL 'type' Antennas questions
by HAMs.

Richard Clark is a goof that hangs out in rec.radio.amateur.antenna
which is a good reason to ignore him.

News group header sniped to RRS.

TELAMON,

"RC" writes very well, and has a great deal of technical expertise
and experience. But the 'tone' of his writing when dealing with
lesser beings (SWLs) is what I find to be a turn-off.

Sure, he writes a great line of BS, but he's wrong about 50% of the time.

He's full of it and full of himself.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California