"DXZoner" wrote in message
gy.com...

"m II wrote:


Everything you say is visible to most of the world. Some of the
hard
core types here refuse to believe that the Moron Prince is
intrinsically
evil, as are the puppet masters pulling his strings.

The American Constitution and the Bill of Rights were written the
way
they were to PREVENT the erosion and elimination of everything the
population and founding fathers held dear. We now get the Foghorn
Leghorn types blustering in, yelling "We don't need no Steenkin'
Constitution".


How gullible..


mike
I often wonder if they are as blind and gullible as they appear, or
their
foolish pride will not allow them to admit they have turned the
government
over to a puppet named George, who is controlled by big business and
the
military. Surley as republicans they can't believe that the ever
ballooning
fed. govt and the incredible debt is in the traditions of
conservatism. It
is the opposite. They do not question why the party that is
suppossed to
shrink the fed has created an "office for election assistance." An
office
that is suppossed to help with fair elections with a official
appointed by
the president who did not get elected, but appoined. Ludicrorus! I
never
thought I would see this day in America, it is certainly a bleak
day. And
bush promises as many wars as it will take, wars that will last for
gererations, endless war. War, something he refused to attend, but
sends off
our young to lose their limbs or die. President for 4 years, tyrant
for
life.
"This would be a lot easier if it were a dictatorship, so long as
I'm the
dictator." GW Bush.
No misunderestimating that statement georgie boy.


Characteristic delusional paranoia from both of you---not that the
actual facts of the article matter much when there's a good baseless,
anti-Bush rant to be had, but here's the operative sentence stripped
of your spin:
"Newsweek cited unnamed sources who told it that the Department of
Homeland Security asked the Justice Department last week to review
what legal steps would be needed to delay the vote if an attack
occurred on the day before or on election day."

Gee, do you suppose it's worth -considering- whether the election
should be postponed if a terrorist attack occurred on either -the day
of the election or day before it-? Considering that one of the
favorite whines from the 2000 election was the ridiculous "count all
the votes" mantra, shouldn't we assure that everyone possible gets to
vote and isn't deterred by an attack?

Oh, and it would probably take a constitutional amendment as well.
But what's a fact or two when the paranoiacs are at work?