= = = longwave wrote in message
= = = ...
Dan wrote:

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:21:37 -0400, longwave
wrote:

A legal recount is conducted by the election officers of a state, not a
newspaper. It would have uncovered the election fraud that resulted in
thousands of minority voters being disenfranchised. This is also
mentioned on that NYT website you referred to. The only fair solution
would have been a statewide re-vote in Florida with careful monitoring
of each polling place.

No, the fair solution is the one that happened. You follow the rules
that everyone agrees to *before the election*. You don't change the
rules later to try to change the outcome, with endless recounts using
different methods each time.

A statewide re-vote in Florida was within the rules.

LW - NOT !

A Re-Vote would have had to be "Ordered" by a Florida Court.

NO Florida Court 'ordered' a Re-Vote or found evidence for a Re-Vote.

Florida Courts did find 'justification' for a Vote "Re-Count".
..
..
Jeb Bush was against it for obvious reasons.

LW - He Acted within 'existing' Florida State Law at the time
of the Election [.]
..
..
It would have uncovered the fraud that
disenfranchised thousands of voters.

LW - One More Liberal LIE and DISTORTION by the Democrats.
..
..