Doug Adler wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 01:22:16 GMT, "Arthur Harris"
wrote:
"clifto" wrote:
Harris wrote:
Well it isn't easy trying to find something that's not there. Clearly, by
March 2003 there were no WMD to be found, although that was the reason given
for rushing into war. How do you explain that to the grieving relatives of
those killed in action?
It's pretty obvious in the aftermath that they were liberals who wouldn't
have found anything unless they couldn't have avoided finding it.
So if there were massive amounts of WMD (as Bush said in his 2003 State of
the Union address), how come we found nothing?
Art H.
You ain't got a clue! Now go look in the mirror, I think your tin foil
hat is just a wee bit askew.
The pattern continues... You can't make a cogent argument based on the
facts, so you resort to personal insults.
Art H.
|