dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

I'm beginning to see a pattern here. I give a detailed, well thought out
argument, and you respond with personal insults and statements like "you
need to do more research." I see few if any relevant responses from you to
the issues I've raised.

Perhaps it is because, unbeknownst to you, that your arguments are not really well
thought out, and they require only a passing comment?

At least I'm arguing issues, and not just making personal insults. If my
arguments are so weak, why can't you rebut them with logic instead of
name calling?

We've all been down your old, tired arguements about WMD's. When a Liberal 'tard is
in trouble, what does he reach for? Yes, that old stuff about WMD's.

WMD is not just some tangential issue; it's the primary reason we got
ourselves into this mess.

Art H.