August 29th 04, 06:58 PM
|
|
|
( OT ) As the truth about Kerry emerges, the Democrats begin to panic
On 29 Aug 2004 16:56:19 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:
On Sun 29 Aug 2004 10:29:08a, (Diverd4777) wrote in
message :
{snippage}
and remember, 9/11 happened on His Watch...
Correct, the "sucker-punch" attack was executed on Bush's watch. It was
undoubtably (in full or part): planned, funded, staffed and logistically
prepared for under Clinton's watch. Then the "Gorelick Wall", erected
during the Clinton watch, impacted the intelligence services ability to
"connect the dots". We could go on and on back three to perhaps six
decades or more.
What's your point? There's plenty of arm-chair quarter-backing to be done
following the sucker-punch the US received.
Four More Years...
Of Bush? Hopefully! At least, in my opinion - your opinion will surely
differ. Although, as I have mentioned before - if Kerry fails to win the
office, I can not think of anything else the Democratic party could
possibly do to get their favored candidate in office. Kerry has seen the
support of most any and every realistically imaginable strategy, tactic
and trick - good, bad or indifferent - to place him in office. If he
fails, what else could the Democrats do to ensure victory next time?
-=jd=-
We need more Bush. I would agree with that. I would gladly give up
some more taxes though to fund the war. Hopefully they can take N
Korea and Iran next year. Those dudes are super crazy and our boys
could put 'em down in a hurry. Does Iran have oil? Just curious.
|