"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Sat 11 Sep 2004 11:16:29p, Dan wrote in message
:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:06:25 -0700, "Gandalf Grey"
wrote:


It's beginning to look like the docs are legitimate. The raised "e"'s
can't be duplicated without a lot of effort in Word.


What "raised e's"? I don't see any.

Dan


There is a single occurrence of an ever so slightly raised "e" in the word
"Colonel" in one of the documents

That's only one instance. There's also the word "interference" in the 18
August memo. Same thing in the word "me" in second line. In the case of
that word, it may be a matter of the "m" falling slightly below the line.

In both case, it's inconsistent with a word processor.

The scan through the fax theory is reaching. Definitely not the most likely
explanation.