Simon Mason wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Mark wrote:

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
Spending hundreds of dollars on a Rolex is a waste of money ;-)


Hundreds of dollars would be fine if it were a real Rolex for that money.
Usually costs a few thousand for a stainless steel one.

Ahhhh... the good 'ol days when I was in the Navy. The ships store often
had
various Rolex in stock. One could buy a Submariner for around $475 dollars
or
so. GMT Masters were a bit less as I recall.

Yeah but my Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex :-)

Suddenly I got a picture in my head of some guy yelling at his old girlfriend as
she hops in the sportscar with the guy wearing the Rolex, " ...yeah, but my
Casio Waveceptor is more accurate than any Rolex"... as she waves goodbye.

dxAce