"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Tue 14 Sep 2004 07:06:09p, "Gandalf Grey"

wrote in message m:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Mon 13 Sep 2004 10:21:01p, "Gandalf Grey"
wrote in message
m:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Mon 13 Sep 2004 08:51:49p, "Gandalf Grey"
wrote in message
m:


{snippage}

Bob Dole Tossed a grenade, it bounced off a tree and he got a nick
on
his shin along with a purple heart.



I hadn't heard. I guess the fact that he's pretty much crippled on
one
side does not matter to you, as much as your attempts to smear
anyone
who has ever served honorably.

Oh I see. Dole ****s up and gets a purple heart but THAT'S okay!

Just so long as I know I'm dealing with the typical right wing
hypocrite.



Gee - Nice knee-jerk assumption there, chuckles! Did I say that someone
getting a P.H. for a "nick" is "okay"?

Apparently yes, since you don't seem to be critical of Dole's
"Technical"
P.H.

That you somehow think Kerry's
"bandaids" somehow equate to Dole's crippling injuries makes a rather
compelling case for your own hypocracy. Try again, sunshine!

To use your own party's attitude, Dole ****ed up and got crippled.
Tough
****!

After all, that seems to have been Saxby "never served" Chambliss's
technique against Max Cleland.


Where did I say that getting a P.H. for a "nick" is "okay", eh chuckles?

So you're on record that Dole didn't deserve his purple heart?


Again, you exaggerate and re-word my post into something it is not.

So far, your "post" isn't anything except a collection of weasel words.

That you
can't defend your own assertion without doing so is now a matter of
record.

My assertion is that Kerry deserved his purple heart as much as Dole
deserved his.