"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Wed 15 Sep 2004 09:47:31p, "Gandalf Grey"
wrote in message
m:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Wed 15 Sep 2004 09:29:18a, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote in message
ink.net:

"-=jd=-" wrote:

I'll base mine on information from the
leading expert in the field (Dr. Bouffard)
and the success of rank amateurs in
reproducing the document. You can
base your opinion on... umm...
whatever...


My own eyes and a little common sense. You talk about "rank
amateurs"
reproducing documents and use that as the basis to say the documents
are fake. All that tells me, instead, is that "rank amateurs" can
fake documents. That certainly doesn't prove to me these particular
documents are fake.

Further, I simply don't agree with your assessment of the documents
produced by those "rank amateurs." Their work does not look like the
documents in question. Their documents were clearly produced on a
computer, while the documents in question were clearly produced on a
typewriter.

Finally, the contents of the documents in question, including
military
document layout, dates, events, and signatures, all match what we
know of the situation at the time. That would be very difficult to
fake without intimate knowledge of each of those (a lot harder than
some "rank amatuers" simply copying what they see on a document in
front of them).

In other words, you'll have to work a lot harder if you want to
convince
me those documents are fake.

Stewart



Convincing anyone is none of my concern, but I do reserve the right to
wonder aloud how a reasonable and prudent person would ignore the
mounting list of indicators pointing to obvious forgeries.

You mean pointed out by freepers within literally minutes of their being
seen on television?

Hardly the sort of reaction designed to fill me with a sense of trust
toward the actual origin of those documents.

This has Rove's smell all over it, and your posting is proof that it's
definitely drawing flies.



Your overwhelming desperation is inherent in your lame attempt to spin and
divert. (Psssst.... no-one's buying that either...) If it helps you any,
see if you can look beyond the "freepers

Why should I? All the right wing sheep squad has going for them is the
sheep squad.