Gandalf Grey wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Gandalf Grey wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...
Dwight Stewart wrote:

"-=jd=-" wrote:

Convincing anyone is none of my concern,
but I do reserve the right to wonder aloud
how a reasonable and prudent person
would ignore the mounting list of indicators
pointing to obvious forgeries. (snip)

Then I trust you won't mind if I reserve the right to wonder aloud
why
you
are so determined to establish, and publically declare, these
documents
to
be forgeries.


Possibly because they are fake?

And possibly because your sound machine is a diversion from the real
issues
of this election.

The diversion was started by CBS when they aired the story.

Not at all. The FACTS about Bush's missing service time and his dodging, IS
ALREADY KNOWN. The CBS report if anything was only more confirmation of
WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. Bush deserted his post and his daddy got him out with
an honorable discharge.

Sorry, but I don't see how your response ties in with my last message.

But if they are facts that are already known, how will forged documents confirm them?

As a reminder, you said:

And possibly because your sound machine is a diversion from the real issues
of this election.

I pointed out this was started when CBS aired the story.

If they hadn't dug up 30+ year old allegations and used what appear to be forged documents to create a story, we'd be discussing something else.