In article ,
"-=jd=-" wrote:

On Wed 22 Sep 2004 10:44:31a, "Dwight Stewart"
wrote in message news:jdg4d.10168$mb6.4465
@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net:

"-=jd=-" wrote:

(snip) After all, you still believe (or you've
fooled yourself into believing) that the CBS
docs are authentic. (snip)
(snip) Your mind is made up, just like your
mind is made up that the CBS docs are
authentic!


And why would anyone believe anything you have to say when you so
blantently lie about my earlier comments? Contrary to your claims above,
here is what I actually said in this newsgroup just ten days ago...

"Look, I don't know if the documents
are fake or not. However, the arguments
used so far to suggest they are fake (line
wrap, character spacing, and a few
superscript characters) are far less than
convincing. With only a photocopy
available, chemical analysis of the paper
would probably be useless. And the
person who sent photocopies of military
documents to the press is not likely to
come forward now to point to the original
documents. So, at this point, the
authenticity of the documents may simply
remain an open question." - 9/13/04

Enough said.

Stewart



So after everyone, including CBS and their experts are equivocating on the
doc's authenticity; not to mention that the source of the documents
(Burkett) has been discredited before; and on and on and on...

You're *still* holding out hope? You crack me up! Tell us all again how
you believe the "authenticity of the documents may simply remain an open
question." Tell us all again how Adm Route's investigation of Kerry's
medals extended below the formal request and was not limited only to the
procedure once the formal request was made.

If you still believe, or are holding out the tiniest shred of hope that
the "authenticity of the (CBS) documents may simply remain an open
question" even after Dan Rather has caved, why should we expect you to put
two and two together in this case? No, really - why *should* we expect you
to put two and two together in this case?

Didn't you hear the Blather - Burkett interview where Burkett stated
that he deliberately mislead Blather on the documents and that they are
fake? No doubt at all after that interview.

Let the investigations begin and lead... all the way to the Kerry
campaign.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California