Yes. I learned long ago (and anyone on here that is truly into radio should
also know this) that the best way to hear a debate is on the radio, just the
way I heard this one. TV throws in to many visual influences that, while
subconscious, have an impact on your perception. The radio gives you what
you should be paying attention to, content. I am surprised that so many
people make judgments about someone's ability to do a job (other than public
speaking ) on the basis of their ability to speak to an audience. Some of
(most actually) of the most intelligent and capable people I know are not
good public speakers. Some of the slimiest, car salesmen and lawyers, could
talk anyone into anything. If you are electing a bull****er, listen to how
he speaks. If you are electing a president, listen to what he says.

"-=jd=-" wrote in message

So, instead of counting the eye-blinks of anyone facing high-wattage
stage-lighting, wouldn't it be more revealing to listen closely to what
was said?