Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote:

"high efficiency mobile hf antenna" that must win some kind of award for
the longest oxymoron in radio speak.


Heh, heh, how about "relatively high efficiency"?

The low efficiency antenna is 1% efficient. The high
efficiency antenna is 2%. That's double the efficiency.
I wouldn't judge efficiency on the basis of a shootout unless
the results were measured in the far field.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH