EH-antenna: sensation or fraude?

I have been reading about the EH-antenna on many web sites and
in magazines, but they were only "kitchen recipies" of how to build it
- without any theoretical explanation. Practical result reports were
mostly contradictory - from being equal to a full size dipole, to
statements that the antenna does not radiate at all, but the coaxial
lead does.

The other day I ran across the EH-antenna home web site
(http://EH-antenna.com) where finally I could find the expected theory -
which left me embarassed. It comes out that the EH antenna uses an
until now unknown kind of magnetic field - completely different from
the usual H-field. "The EH-antenna is a revolutionary concept because
it does not fit the classical theory" - I can read on that Web-site.
In a classical dipole the phase-shift between the E and the H field is
90 degrees. In the EH-antenna it is 0 (zero) degrees! A certain Russian
phisicist Vladmir Korobeynikov reworked the famous Maxwell's four
equations and they are now called "enhanced ones". Possibly he will be
candidated for the Nobel prize in physics (!?). Since magnetic
force-lines are closed and cannot be cut apart, underwater EH-antennas
allegedly work equally well - a bonanza for submarines! It also seems
that those force-lines spread across the whole Universe in zero time -
which challenges the Einstein's theory of the limited speed of light to
300 000 km/sec. If all this is only partly true, this will be the
greatest discovery after Heinrich Herz discovered radio waves 130
years ago.

They also say that the best communication is made between the
two EH-antennas. Has anybody tried that already? I do not wish to be a
primitive Earthian who does not accept progress in science; however,
life has taught me to be cautious. I would like to read an official
report about the EH-antenna phenomenon from a competent scientific
institution, a University, a research laboratory, or similar. Any
comments?
Bozidar, 9a2hl