On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:35:26 -0400, "Mark S. Holden"
wrote:

Mr William Ev erhart III wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:59:49 -0600, Sir Cumference
wrote:


Mr William Everfart III wrote:


On 26 Oct 2004 17:42:15 -0500, Dan wrote:



That's Dan Rather all over. He has *hated* the Bushes ever since
George H. W. Bush embarrassed him when he made his famous remark to
Rather about him walking off the stage when Wimbledon ran late.



True. Dan Rather has it out for Bush. So what? What's your problem
with it? He's entitled to his opinion.

He is not entitled to use the CBS network as a news reporter to express
his personal opinions. He is supposed to report the news, not make it up.



He certainly is entitled.

If he identifies it as commentary, I'll agree - but when he presents
information with a specific slant to promote his objectives, it
shouldn't be called news.


I think you've given a fair and balanced answer. You're right.