StephenH wrote:

dxAce wrote in message ...
StephenH wrote:
It's shortsighted to write off DRM so soon. It must be given a
chance.

Sure, keep the QRM a coming....

As sarcastic as that may (be intended to) sound, you know, I know and
I'm sure everyone else knows that is a serious point. DRM *is*
causing serious problems to adjacent channels. The evidence is there
on a daily basis, and if DRM is to grow this problem will only get
worse.

This is where the HFCC should come in. If DRM is going to be taken
seriously, even by long-term hardcore DXers, then it can't be made to
co-exist smack back in the middle of established AM broadcasts. There
*has* to be a "DRM corner", on a few or all of the broadcast SW metre
bands. Initally, a space of 50 to 100 kHz on each band, dedicated to
DRM only broadcasts. Where this might be allowing more capacity than
required for DRM in the meantime, it should allow DRM to grow a little
more - possibly to the extent where it might begin to be commerically
attractive/viable - with NO impact on existing AM broadcasts. As time
goes on, increase the DRM "band" while reducing the AM band. AM
doesn't need to disappear completely, nor do I believe it will. (Same
with FM vs DAB/IBOC)

But there must be more to it than this. Maybe I'm making it sound too
simple, there *must* be a real, logical reason as to why this approach
hasn't already been taken. Otherwise, doesn't this approach solve
most problems with interference, whilst giving DRM the space it needs
to grow a little more?

I certainly agree with you.

dxAce
Michigan
USA