You also had another offer to range test, but I can full well
appreciate your backing off from that in overdrive. Any such offers
should be closely attended by "Who owns the intellectual rights to the
results?" If you claimed X gain and the test demonstrated X+1 results
because of "simple adjustments" at the site, "Who owns the
intellectual rights to the results AND the "new" antenna?" If you
attempted to publish the results (assuming they were complementary)
would you be threatened with plagiarism and copyright violation?

Answers to these questions may be researched at the Google Archives by
simply entering the search terms of "Patent Pending," "you may be
sued," "my lawyer will contact your lawyer," "intellectual property."
Once you use any one of these phrases (or all of them - it constitutes
one of our best Soap Operas), simply sort on the basis of author hits
to see who holds the record for these issues as a business manifesto.

It won't be Roy.

There seem to be solutions in the queue, what remains to be seen is if
one or several are visited, or if future communication will be stuck
in the groove of repetition and denial.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


As far as I'm concerned, the results are for Chuck to do what he wants with;
I'm just volunteering time, range, and equipment.

And, if Mr. Lewallen wants a proxy, he can get his colleague Steve Best to come
down. Steve works about 1/2 mile from here.

Of course, should Chuck's results be compatible with his specs, then it seems
that a third party must pay the bill.

That sure seems fair to me.

No one is frustrated, as far as I am aware of.

Why are you trying to create problems that don't exist, Mr. Clarke?

73,
Chip N1IR