Richard Clark wrote in message
news
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:03:10 -0700, "Chuck"
wrote:

I have for a long time, suspected there
was a tx line modeling problem in NEC.
Now, it is apparent this problem exists
only in your EZNEC.


Hi Chuck,

You asked how to avoid this (if indeed it exists), and I offered a
very simple response to which you have had no comment.

Hi Richard,

To be blunt, I didn't see any merit in your
suggestion. (1) there are no modeling
alternatives for this problem, and (2) it
failed to address the issue: Roy's apparent
omission of the thin-wire model in his EZNEC,
which he touts as a complete NEC application.

I suggest you re-read the posts if you truly
are interested, then read the NEC2d
documentation to confirm. As far as
independent empirical testing is concerned,
there is nothing new to be learned other than
revealing EZNEC's shortcomings in this
regard.

Roy has offered a means to have a third party verify your claims,
independent of his software such that it comes down to you are right,
or he is right. You have not taken this offer

I accepted Roy's offer, but with conditions. So
far, he has declined to accept those conditions.

I did accept Chip's offer, though.

IRT your other oratory ramblings: Incoherent
nonsense...

73 de Chuck, WA7RAI