"Dan Robinson" wrote in message
...
I have had an R8 since 1993 -- still prefer its clean lines in comparison
with the later models, and in terms of reception is one heck of a radio

Michael Lawson wrote:

So an R8 - R8A wasn't that much of a jump but an
R8A - R8B was, in your opinion??

--Mike L.


"starman" wrote in message
...

Michael Lawson wrote:

Okay, I know the differences between the R8/R8A/R8B, but
are the differences enough to make it worth the differences
in price used?? I've seen ~$400 for an R8, ~$650 for an R8A,
and ~$800+ for an R8B. I know that the R8 had it's flaws,
but enough for a $400 difference?? Heck, Universal has an
Icom R-71A for ~$500, and that's only $100 less than what it
was about 10 years ago on the used market.

--Mike L.

I wouldn't pay $650 for an R8A but $800 is a good price for an R8B.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----

http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption

=---






I seem to be under the impression the R8 is a better buy then a R8A since it
has an optical encoder. I'm talking used equipment now. I have heard of
people's encoder going bad on the R8a, but not many on the R8. Is this
something I should continue to believe?

Lucky