View Single Post
  #68   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 04, 03:15 AM
mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

define -credible source-



One that presents the whole truth that is openly available at


is pbs a credible source?
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t224_full.html
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t344_full.html
http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/tr...t347_full.html

the time. (Hope you don't mind my re-adding the parts of my post


get a newsreader that can followe the references line

what would you call treason? in law?


I have not asserted anything is treason. Why do you ask?


then perhaps you should not rush to heathers defense

,
Heather Davison
wrote:

whoever put up that websight shold be tryed for
treason. that is giving aid and comfort to the
enemy. it is treason.


so how do you feel about the truths of powell and cheney
and rumsfield and rice and shrub?


I've already made that clear. Do you think you can recall it


so you accept anything an authority fiugure claims as the truth
or just republican authority figures?
does bbc or pbs or any other news service that shows their lies
mean they are not a credible source?

Nope, I don't have any problem with you and your soul-mate
Dan Blather spreading partial truths. I *DO* have a problem
when you cop an attitude after I expose you for the
propagandist you are. Rant all you want - we'll reserve the
right to continue to (appropriately) reject your invalid
point of view.

Oh, and be sure to snip out the parts of my post that you
simply can't deal with...


and what propaganda is that?


I've already made that clear as well. Do you think you can


when you cop an attitude after I expose you for the
propagandist you are. Rant all you want - we'll reserve the


and what propaganda are you accusing me of?

you were incapable of addressing) In any event, it is painfully
clear that you are wholly incapable of defending your blatatly
invalid point of view - you know, the invalid liberal/leftist
point of view that was resoundingly rejected by the majority of
voters in the most recent election - without lamely resorting to
redundant and insipid questions. Perhaps you should google-up
some debating skills that will allow you to respond to a post
without being forced to snip out the parts that stymie you. Taa-


gosh thats a devastating conclusion
now announce plonk
and ran away secure in your prejudices

arf meow arf

cthulu loves you
he loves the little children
with ketchup please