What, you've never heard of military tribunals for
military personnel?

My question stands, because the two are different
types. A member of the US military convicted of a
capital crime can be sentenced to death. Quite different
than executing prisoners of war or mass murder.

Does that make Nuremberg a "Death Camp"?? Hardly.
But the inference is there, because people were executed
there, that I because I think that the trials at Nuremberg
were justified as were the outcome, that I must be one
sick puppy. Or that because I feel that a guy by the
name of Dahmer should have been executed, I am a sick
puppy.

--Mike L.


"m II" wrote in message
news:914ud.3745$eb3.2812@clgrps13...
Michael Lawson wrote:

So, which is it? "Death camp" where thousands are killed
for the crime of being jewish/muslim/whatever, or a prison
camp that has an execution chamber, where those who have
been convicted of capital crimes can be executed?

(snipped)


If all it takes for you to absolve the US of war crimes is the
VOLUME
of people processed through the 'execution chambers', you are one
sick
puppy.

Convicted? How? There no courts. No witnesses. Prisoners can not be
killed at the whim of the victors. Geneva doesn't apply to you?

As for doing something, I am. Maroon 'Ace' keeps saying he's
invading
us. I'll just wait. Master Maroon Fort agrees with him in everything
he says.

My heart goes out to the Decent Americans everywhere who are shaking
their heads in disbelief and sorrow as the neocons dismantle the
integrity of a once proud Nation.




mike