Gene Fuller wrote:
No one has ever discussed simple series DC concepts except you.

Don't you recognize "17th century DC concepts" as sarcasm?

What is wrong is calling a lossy transmission
line a "simple series circuit" and then misapplying the theory.

That's exactly my point, Gene. I think you missed it. What is
wrong is assuming a simple one-way series current flowing through
a point inductance in a *standing-wave* mobile antenna containing
a one foot by one foot 75m *bugcatcher* coil that occupies more
than 60 degrees of an electrical 1/4 wavelength.

The original argument originated over on eHam.net. Tom, W8JI
said there is no change in current from end to end in a loading
coil. Yuri disagreed. Everything else is a fallout from that
original argument.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---