Tom Donaly wrote:
you may never have had an exchange with Cecil. Cecil will use
any tactic in the book to "win" an argument, the more illogical
the better. Moreover, he's absolutely dogged in his determination to
have the last word, going so far as to make completely idiotic posts
in the hopes that his opponent will quit in disgust. Unless you
want to engage in a 500 post exercise in absolute lunacy, you might
want to ignore Cecil altogether, as several of us do.

One wonders if you are capable of anything except ad nauseum ad hominem
attacks. So far, my grouchy ten-year-old grand-neice could have made your
postings.

Tom, so far, you have offered absolutely nothing of a technical nature
to prove me wrong. That's a big clue that you have nothing to offer. If
you can easily prove me wrong, why haven't you? If you can prove me to
be technically wrong, I will yield to you in respect. However, until I
am proven wrong or sentenced to house arrest, you can expect me to have
an attitude similar to Galileo's up against the Catholic priests. Is one
iota of proof too much to ask?

Balanis says you are wrong! Kraus says you are wrong! EZNEC even says
you are wrong! Today I created a one foot high helical antenna that packs
90 electrical degrees into one foot. The current at the bottom is one amp.
The current at the top is zero amps. Want me to send you the EZNEC file?

Here's your chance. Exactly what is the difference between a 1/2WL #16
single-wire transmission line 24 feet above ground and a #16 1/2WL dipole
24 feet above ground? Please be technically specific. Your feelings don't
matter.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---