"Ed Price" wrote in message
news:afPhd.88762$kz3.24282@fed1read02...

"chuck" wrote in message
news:C8vhd.88148$kz3.43033@fed1read02...

"Ed Price" wrote in message
news:2wlhd.87747$kz3.12494@fed1read02...

"Chuck" wrote in message
news:sQehd.3217$GN4.1349@okepread02...

Ed Price wrote in message
news:qZdhd.87705$kz3.49376@fed1read02...

"Chuck" wrote in message
news:%zbhd.3210$GN4.3006@okepread02...
Yes, Saddam was a first-class jerk and two-
bit tyrant, but was not an immediate threat to
America - he lost 2 wars and was sanctioned
by the UN - his army was left impotent, his
major weapons were destroyed after the gulf
war, his WMD programs were in shambles,
...
GWB is a war criminal - too bad you support
a real war criminal - and that's not spin.

Indeed Chuck, that's not spin. I'd call you an honest,
straightforward
propagandist; what we used to simply refer to as a liar.

You mean like the debunked Swiftboat vets for Bush

Your judgement only. Odd, the only time Kerry managed anything, he left
with
270-some "employees" ****ed at him; and they still are, 35 years later.

Perhaps I give greater credibility to the folks
who served with Kerry in this regard, than
the vile rhetoric of folks with an un-American
religious/political agenda. Kerry was not alone
in his distain for that war, but the hawks who
opposed his position then, are still carrying a
grudge now - after all these years - that's both
obsessive and perverted IMO!

When a President has more loyalty to his
mega-corporate cronies and the looney
megalomaniac Pat Robertson, than he has
for the common folk, he does not deserve
to hold the office.

Chuck



Some things can be forgiven, some can be forgotten. But how can you savage
the opinion of 270-some veterans with a judgement of "obsessive and
perverted"? Of course, their feelings are being used for political
influence
(remember Kerry saying he was "reporting and ready for duty"). But you are
way out of line to judge their memories.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Ed,

Out of line? ROTFLMAO!

One cannot give credence to a piddly few
malcontents (270 out of millions) who have
an agenda - mainly that of the Christian
Coaliton. In contrast, the folks who served
with Kerry, have an entirely different story to
tell - a credible one!


I suppose your close really says it all; you say the candidate is loyal to
"mega-corporate cronies" and "loonies". Ahhhh, I'm dealing with the
Almighty
Chuck, the mortal who can discern cronies from friends and who can define
the Common Folk. Yep, that answers everything.

It is common knowledge that the
Republican party is traditionally aligned
to the rich and powerful, which includes
mega-corporate interests - "no bid"
Halliburton included - only a fool would
refute this.

As far as loonies, I've named only one:
the one who's agenda is to "replace the
constitution with the 10 commandments"
and to "Disenfranchize all liberals".

Rather than offer a credible retort, you
attempt to demean my position.
Intellectual honesty isn't one of your
strong points, I see.

Chuck

Ed
wb6wsn