wrote:

read this

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Bo...namese_CP.html


That article was written in 1999, and represents an unusual year for
Eisner.

Most of his income was from gains on stock he sold. He gets options
every year. At the time, he'd been CEO for 15 years so he had a while
to collect them.

Still, even with the unusual extra income, he made less than 60% of the
amount you were talking about.

Here's the page on Eisner from Forbes for 2004:

http://www.forbes.com/static/execpay2004/LIRC3YW.html?passListId=12&passYear=2004&passListT ype=Person&uniqueId=C3YW&datatype=Person

Is he over paid? Probably. But the stock holders are the ones who
should be complaining.