RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 21st 05, 04:02 PM

From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote in
:
I have no concept? The spread entails a team

being either favored or underdog, if they win

by the points thew odds makers from Vegas

they get a win in the ATS colum if they lose

they get a loss.
That's the ticket.

Ok so why the problem Pittsburgh betors

would have made some good money the past

5 years. Now your problem is in the games in

which they lose against the spread. The

typically win the games when they are favored
in a close game.

" the Steelers are working on a perfect 11-0

ATS mark when favored by 7.5 points or less

over the last two seasons... in other words,

Pittsburgh takes care of business when the

expected outcome is close..."

Gambling, alcoholism,,,you have multiple vices.

As do you lying, deceit and ignorance to name
a few. Sorry I am not much into drinking, or

any kind of drugs, with the exception of some

mary jane..

Booze will kill ya' faster.

_
Your kid brother's pop warner game don't count.

Yep when the truth hits home the insults fly,

Nah,,that's not an insult,,that's a friendly "gimme".

since when does pop warner games have a

point spred. No tipsy it was circa 86/87 the

year of the expansion teams Miami heat vs

Houston rockets. Houston Rockets at home vs
the heat a sure Lock if there ever was

one.myself and a few friends plonked down

$30,000 between us on Houston, favored by

-5, Miami won the game outright. The posted

line changed a 1/2 point after our wager. you

can chose to belive it or not makes no

difference to me.

Nah,,I believe you...I don't follow basketball anymore...haven't since
Julius Irving and the sixers gave Philthy something to be proud
of....During the years you mentioned, I was pretty isolated and my world
was limited to two things,,,,school and kids.

PIT is 7-7 ATS over the last 10 years (L10Y)

in playoff games

Being the big, vegas gambler you are, you know what that record
means...an incredible improvement over what they *historically* record.
Whether you realize it or not, you are making
quite a case against what you profess. Keep posting those records over
the years.

I think I am doing quite a job of provin it past

49 games they covered the spread 29 times.

thats a 69% a sports gambler and even Jim

Feist would love to have that as a winning

percenatge

I guess our parting of the ways on this subject is what we each consider
"historically" to constitute. Feist, perhaps,,Jimmy the Greek,,never. I
admit, their record against the spread *has* improved over the years.
So tell me,,,,,are you taking any line action with Pittsburgh giving 3?