On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:22:58 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:


Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring out the "best" in our
little psychotic friend.


You're confused, Dave.

Hardly.



It's also no secret that his psychobabble seems to keep you going.


Newsflash: I argue with Twisty to keep my own wits sharp.

You admitted it yourself, Twisty "debates" by playing head games with
people. That's hardly your style Frank. Certainly not something worthy
enough to be called "sharpening your wits".


I argue with you because you are ignorant.

Which started coincidentally when you found out that I support the
opposite political party. Before that we were on good terms. Now you
"think" (and I use the term loosely) that I'm an idiot for it. If that
isn't a partisan pundit attitude, I don't know what is.

Only an idiot argues with another idiot Frank. You "argue" with me,
because you are unable to present your "side" with anything other than
your own opinions. The fact that I can effectively deflect your
"facts" as the op-ed opinions that they truly are frustrates you.

The facts are not in your favor Frank.

At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....


Your political spectrum analyzer is out of alignment, Dave.

You certainly are entitled to your opinion, as wrong as it might
be.....

And you
haven't read a single word I've written because, and to put it simple
enough for a 1st grader, I don't take sides when it comes to politics.
I oppose Bush because he's a criminal, not because he's a Republican.

Where is the proof that Bush is a "criminal"? What is your basis for
making such an outlandishly absurd and so typically partisan claim?


And if you had any evidence..... or even a reasonable suspicion that
Kerry was in any way a criminal, I could accept it.

The evidence is there. It came out of Kerry's own mouth. He admitted
to taking part in the atrocities in Vietnam on Meet the Press on April
18th 1971. Now Frank, you are a man who claims to embrace logic, so
riddle me this then. If Kerry is telling the truth about his part in
these "atrocities", then is he not guilty of a war crime? On the other
hand, if he didn't take part, and the whole issue was a blown up
fabrication, doesn't that make him a liar? Would you want someone who
lied like that to be your CNC? How many other lies did he make in the
aftermath of the who winter soldier debacle and the VVAW movement
which followed?


But so far you
have offered nothing but excuses, logical fallacies, and websites with
forged documents and paranoid rants.

As opposed to the sites you provided which were nothing more than the
flip side of what I provided?

You discard what I provided because you refuse to acknowledge the
possibility. You don't want to believe it so you deny it. You came up
with some sort of "font analysis" on one document, and concluded that
it was a forgery, so then you projected that conclusion to all the
rest of the evidence.


If you are really a supporter of
the Republican party then you should keep quiet on political issues
because you are giving your party some very poor representation.

I am a conservative, and I support those who best represent my
political views.

I also believe in the history and honor of our country, its military
and the judgement of its leader in matters of national security and
enemies of the state.

Dave
"Sandbagger"