N3CVJ wrote:
Where is the proof that Bush is a "criminal"?

(How about his conviction for DUI? That alone defines him as a
criminal.)

What is your basis for

making such an outlandishly absurd and so

typically partisan claim?

(Now there's a loaded question if I ever heard one. Regardless, I think
Twisty would me more than eager to provide an answer so I'll let him
take the first jab.)


Of interesting note, is when one has a conviction in a court of law on
his record, Dave vehemently lobbies his view they are innocent...not a
criminal.
Ditto for when one is listed on the rainreport and reported by the fcc
as breaking communication law.,,Dave lobbied for the innocence of
N8WWM..yet, when one is not found guilty in court of law, not charged
with a crime, Dave somehow feels qualified to pronounce one a federal
criminal, based only on what he refers his "empirical observational
skills", which bring us imaginary hams and hallucinations he
acknowledges but refuses to share.
Dave's world is no longer a factor.