Thread
:
ARS License Numbers
View Single Post
#
656
January 27th 05, 01:55 PM
K4YZ
Posts: n/a
wrote:
Len Anderson wrote:
In article .com,
writes:
Steve Robeson K4YZ wrote:
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From:
Date: 1/6/2005 6:00 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
. com
Lenof21 wrote:
WHY? The license holder isn't prohibited from doing
anything
after
midnight of the last day of his/her 10-year-active-license
period...and for two more years into that grace period.
That's simply not true, Len. The holder of an expired FCC
amateur
radio license cannot legally operate until the license has been
renewed.
This is the second time I've seen you state that mistake here
in
the
past few days. An expired FCC amateur license carries *no*
operating
privleges.
IS there some reason you persist in this obvious error?
I told ya... His Worminess has yet laid his long-tailed
ignorance
to
bare in a house full of rocking chairs.
It's just a mistake, Steve. Len Anderson obviously doesn't
understand
97.21(b).
Tsk, tsk, tsk. The Nun of the Above simply didn't understand
that his/her/it leg was pulled.
Len,
Who are you addressing as "Nun of the Above"? Can't be me.
If you're pulling any body part, it isn't mine and it isn't
a leg.
I am sure that the part being pulled and Lennie's sexual identity
crisis are the reasons behind Lennie's lack of offspring.
All of this is *extremely basic* regulatory stuff, clearly stated
in
97.21(b), not somebody's opinion or interpretation.
Tsk.
Yes, Len, one would think you'd know something that basic about
Part 97. But not only are you spouting mistakes, you refuse to
acknowledge them.
Len has no knowledge of Amateur regulatory matters as he is not a
licensed Amateur.
The Nun of the Above
Who would that be?
has constantly made his
"his"? Nuns are female.
As I was saying...
Lennie keeps leaving us irrefutable evidence that he has some
very...uhhhh....significantly altered perceptions of gender role
assingment.
(Unidentified person) constantly refers to old regulations,
including those made by government radio regulating agencies
which no longer existed after 1934.
Which old regulations, Len?
The only regulations I've referred to recently are current ones.
Like 97.21(b). Do you know that one?
Obvioulsy not. It's available via numerous on-line resources,
however it's obvious that Lennie has not availed himself of any of
them.
All simply MUST do so...as it has always
been done...no good reasons given.
Operating within the law isn't a good reason?
It's "not cool" to be law-abiding in Lennie's neighborhood.
As for the Latin, it's one of the languages my ancestors used.
Lennie's current "schtick" is to try and undermine others posts by
claiming they don't have a "working knowledge" of the language of any
one specific word they may use.
Ceertainly HE has no such mastery either...It's all just for
argument's sake, which is all that Lennie's about any way.
They had world-class poetry, art, drama, philosophy, mathematics,
formal logic, science, engineering, architecture, public works, a
representative form of government, etc. Much of what they
accomplished
we still use today - even down to most of the alphabet used to write
in
this newsgroup.
At about the same time in history, *your* ancestors were busy
painting
their faces blue, howling at the moon and worshipping trees. All they
gave us of any value was the names of some of the days of the week.
At Lennie's age, he TURNS blue, can properly identify the moon
three out of five times, and hikes a leg when he gets anywhere near a
tree. Her can usually (but not always) get the days of the week in
order if given a jingle to remember them by.
73
Steve, K4YZ
Reply With Quote