Richard Clark wrote:

: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:35:21 GMT,
: (ZZZPK)
: wrote:
:
: Or set to your partner?
: no ...
:
: dancing.
: That IS a dancing term. The question is in what proportion is it to
: antennas?

oh... set dancing is very much related to antennas.

you can have a set of 4, 6, 8 or more
all or some dancing together (driven in phase)
or all dancing to a slighly different pattern (out of phase)

some dancers were BOOTS...others dance BAREFOOT (10-4)


the proportion is as you like it, just depends how distant your
observation is....and of course how lacking one's understanding of
set theory is.