Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.

Todd N9OGL




"Phil Kane" wrote in message
ganews.com...
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:57:28 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:

If you want to be a broadcaster, here is a far out idea.....Get a
license
to be a broadcaster.

Tried that seven times with waivers and the FCC wouldn't consider my
application and waiver

After several times you didn't get the message, did you ??

so my opinion is **** YOU, THE FCC AND THE HORSES YOU
ALL RODE ON!!!

Does your mother know that you use such language in public ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----