Phil Kane wrote:

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:


Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure. These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.


Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

And he wonders why the FCC didn't consider his application and waiver.