hey dumbass that wasn't the reason so why don't you and philly go back to
kissing those *******s at the FCC asses.

Todd N9OGL

"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Phil Kane wrote:

On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:12:11 -0600, Todd Daugherty wrote:


Well Phil, Since I didn't get a broadcast license I guess you ****ing
ham
operator are going to have to deal with me.
As for the language I'm ****ed off about the whole deal and I'll
continue to
be ****ed off. Here you have a ****ing agency going to court telling a
judge
that all a person has to do is apply for a license and ask for a waiver.
But
when a person does apply for a license and a waiver they don't consider
it.
Bottom line the FCC ARE A BUNCH OF ****ING LIARS!! so Phil go to your
old
bosses or perhaps that dumbass Hollingsworth is on here and you both can
tell your bosses that I said that they SHOULD EAT **** AND DIE!
I often get sick of all these ****ing ham operators who bitch and
whine
about the code issue, the changes in the amateur license structure.
These
little ****er don't realize how ****ing easy they've got it. With that
said,
just a reminder since I don't have a broadcast license that I'm going to
uses the ham bands. So my opinion is you and the FCC is to go ****
yourselves.


Such clear, concise, and courteous language ..... shows us all the
level of your maturity and the clarity of your thought proccesses.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

And he wonders why the FCC didn't consider his application and waiver.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----