View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old February 7th 05, 05:46 AM
William E. Sabin
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes, I agree. Thanks.

Bill W0IYH

"J M Noeding" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 12:46:05 GMT, "William E. Sabin"
wrote:

I have had no trouble with Q=200 coils. I have a Boonton Q meter that
verifies this when the correct core material (especially in a toroid) is
used. At 30 MHz we do have to be somewhat persistent, though.

Best regards,

Bill W0IYH


Bill,
what I meant is that "when you want to make a coil with Q=200 - not
180 or 190" you may have to try some times if you haven't any
experience from which materials gives at least Q=200, a higher Q may
always be reduced to 200 with a resistor
Yes, I have a Radiometer Q-meter - quite old, almost as old as yours,
with thermionic tubes from the 30's and 50's, hi

73,
jan-martin
LA8AK
---
J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand
http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm